the image of this calendar kindly donated by
the President of The Stevengraph Collectors Association

Auld Lang Syne.

SHOULD AULD ACQUAINTANCE BE FORGOT, AND NEVER BROUGHT TO MIND
SHOULD AULD ACQUAINTANCE BE FORGOT, AND AULD LANG SYNE?
AND SURELY YE'LL BE YOUR PINT STOUP, AS SURE AS I'LL BE MINE
AND WE'LL TAK'A CUP O'KINDNESS YET, FOR AULD LANG SYNE.
WE TWA HAE RUN ABOOT THE BRAES, AND PU'D THE GOWANS FINE
BUT WE'VE WANDER'D MONY A WEARY FIT, SIN AULD LANG SYNE.
AND THERE'S A HAND MY TRUSTY FRIEN', AND GIE'S A HAND O' THINE
AND WE'LL TAK A RIGHT GUID WILLIE WAUGHT, FOR AULD LANG SYNE.

[image of music]

CHORUS

FOR AULD LANG SYNE, MY DEAR, FOR AULD LANG SYNE,
WE'LL TAK' A CUP OF O'KINDNESS YET, FOR AULD LANG SYNE.

[image of music]

Auld Lang Syne

as 1955 Calendar

Woven on Silk:-
see above

Printed at top of card:-
With the Compliments of

Printed at bottom of card:-
Woven in Silk
W. H. GRANT & CO., COVENTRY.

Card-mount:
Lift up flap: cm deep by cm wide
Overall card: cm deep by cm wide

silk:
cm high by cm wide

Godden does not record this silk either as a calendar or picture; only as a postcard.

The image above is unmistakenly that of a Grant calendar front central flap, containing the woven silk. There is however no indication as to which calendar year it relates. The only year unaccounted for is 1955, and it is hence assumed the silk above relates to that year. There is of course the possibility this assumption is incorrect.

This page was created on 12 November 2025

copyright

Reference Number:-	Godden Number:-	Grant Catalogue Number:-
gt 255	not recorded	unknown

Words:	Woven on Silk:- see above Printed at top of card:- With the Compliments of Printed at bottom of card:- Woven in Silk W. H. GRANT & CO., COVENTRY.
Size:	Card-mount: Lift up flap: cm deep by cm wide Overall card: cm deep by cm wide silk: cm high by cm wide
Comments:	Godden does not record this silk either as a calendar or picture; only as a postcard. The image above is unmistakenly that of a Grant calendar front central flap, containing the woven silk. There is however no indication as to which calendar year it relates. The only year unaccounted for is 1955, and it is hence assumed the silk above relates to that year. There is of course the possibility this assumption is incorrect.